Essay Contest Winners Announced
Created on 29 October 2012
festival
Festival for Freedom announces Essay Contest Winners
Festival for Freedom has announced the winners of $1600 in prizes in its first essay contest. The contest was open to high school seniors in Western New York’s area codes 716 and 585, plus selected other counties. The subject, about which entrants submitted a 700-1000 word essay, was:
“Freedom of Conscience is Essential to all Freedoms, Especially the Freedom of Religion”
The contest was announced on this website www.FestivalforFreedom.com and a mailing announcing the contest and its entry rules was sent to 261 High School principals in Western New York. All known public and private schools were contacted, and the information also made available to home schools where they could be identified. Announcements were sent to more than 40 newspapers and radio stations, including The Station of the Cross Catholic Radio, which provided frequent spot announcements for several weeks leading up to the closing date of the contest. Students of any faith, or of no faith, were welcome to participate. In some cases, individual entries were received; and in some cases multiple entries were received from a class in which students were encouraged by their teachers to enter.
Awards: A committee of four judges read the essays and chose the following four winners, and two runners up for honorable mention:
GOLD: First Prize $1000 to Emily Sullivan of Cleveland Hills High School in Cheektowaga, who wrote: “The freedom of conscience is the right to follow and to hold true to one’s own beliefs and morals.”
SILVER (TIE): Second Prize of $500 to be split between Morgan Seeley of Bradford Central School in Bradford, who wrote: “To reach an opinion, one thinks with one’s mind. To reach a conclusion of conscience, one thinks with one’s soul,” and Bethany Lynn Steele of Frewsburg High School in Frewsburg, who wrote: “While government protects the right for an individual to practice his or her faith, they should, also, not force them to promote programs they don’t believe in.”
BRONZE: Third Prize $100 to Nellie Owens of Cato-Meridian High School in Cato, who wrote: “Without the ability to do what someone believes is the right thing, the individual, in truth, does not have the freedom to answer to their conscience and therefore is deprived from being able to practice their religion.”
Receiving Honorable Mention were:
Ben Drexler of Aquinas Institute in Rochester, who wrote: “Freedom of Conscience allows citizens of the United States to work towards the common good of the people….”
Joseph Saltarelli of Cardinal O’Hara High School in Tonowanda, who wrote: “If choices are what make us, then conscience is the self-learned governance of those choices…. Conscience is … the workable substance of our character.”
Judges’ Review
The judges commented on the diligence with which many entrants researched the subject, and the unique views by which they expressed themselves. Many of the entrants demonstrated a keen understanding of the difference between conscience and opinion.
The judges expressed their delight that so many of the entrants understood that Freedom of Conscience, which underpins and is essential to the Freedom of Religion, is a freedom which comes from God, and not from government. But, accordingly, the students also expressed the understanding that it is the responsibility of government, enshrined in the Bill of Rights, to protect those God-given freedoms.
The judges were also impressed at the wide ranging ability of the students to quote from Madison to Mahatma Gandhi, from Pinocchio to Popes, from Lincoln to Locke, as well as references to The Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution, the UN’s Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the Star Spangled Banner. Their examples were as wide ranging as Lord Baltimore’s Toleration Act, the Five Pillars of Islam, Nordquist’s Safir-Whorf Hypothesis, the impact of conscientious objection, the Holocaust, and the abortion-subsidizing Obamacare, with its HHS Mandate.
There were only two areas where the judges noted their desire to see more clarity in some of the submissions. One was around the issue of toleration and the obligation to be tolerant and respectful of people, but not to compromise one’s own conscience by tolerance of doctrines, beliefs or opinions which violate that individual’s own conscience. The other area which the judges felt needs a deeper understanding is when the exercise of individual conscience requires civil disobedience, the revolutionary basis upon which the United States was founded. Perhaps that subject might even become the opportunity for a future essay contest, the judges speculated.
The Festival for Freedom notes with appreciation the efforts of all entrants, and the support of their teachers, principals and families in generating submissions for this contest, which illustrates the encouraging result that an understanding of conscience is alive and well among the young adults on the brink of voting.